Co-production opportunities seized and missed in decision-support frameworks for climate-change adaptation in agriculture – How do we practice the “best practice”?
Aleksandra Dolinska
(1)
,
Emeline Hassenforder
(2, 3, 4, 5)
,
Ana Maria Loboguerrero
,
Benjamin Sultan
(6)
,
Jérôme Bossuet
(7)
,
Jeanne Cottenceau
(8)
,
Michelle Bonatti
,
Jon Hellin
,
Insaf Mekki
(9)
,
Alexis Drogoul
(10, 11, 8)
,
Vincent Vadez
(12, 13, 14, 15, 16)
1
Lisode
2 UMR G-EAU - Gestion de l'Eau, Acteurs, Usages
3 Cirad-ES - Département Environnements et Sociétés
4 UM - Université de Montpellier
5 INAT - Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie
6 UMR 228 Espace-Dev, Espace pour le développement
7 Independent Consultant
8 IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
9 INRGREF - Institut National de Recherche en Génie Rural Eaux et Forêts
10 UMMISCO - Unité de modélisation mathématique et informatique des systèmes complexes [Bondy]
11 Thuyloi University
12 UMR DIADE - Diversité, adaptation, développement des plantes
13 LAPSE - LMI Adaptation des Plantes et microorganismes associés aux Stress Environnementaux [Dakar]
14 CERAAS - Centre d'Etude Regional Pour l'Amelioration de l'Adaptation A la Secheresse
15 ISRA - Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles [Dakar]
16 ICRISAT - International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics [Inde]
2 UMR G-EAU - Gestion de l'Eau, Acteurs, Usages
3 Cirad-ES - Département Environnements et Sociétés
4 UM - Université de Montpellier
5 INAT - Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie
6 UMR 228 Espace-Dev, Espace pour le développement
7 Independent Consultant
8 IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
9 INRGREF - Institut National de Recherche en Génie Rural Eaux et Forêts
10 UMMISCO - Unité de modélisation mathématique et informatique des systèmes complexes [Bondy]
11 Thuyloi University
12 UMR DIADE - Diversité, adaptation, développement des plantes
13 LAPSE - LMI Adaptation des Plantes et microorganismes associés aux Stress Environnementaux [Dakar]
14 CERAAS - Centre d'Etude Regional Pour l'Amelioration de l'Adaptation A la Secheresse
15 ISRA - Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles [Dakar]
16 ICRISAT - International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics [Inde]
Aleksandra Dolinska
Connectez-vous pour contacter l'auteur
- Fonction : Auteur correspondant
- PersonId : 1306297
Connectez-vous pour contacter l'auteur
Emeline Hassenforder
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 735054
- IdHAL : emeline-hassenforder
- ORCID : 0000-0003-3873-8871
- IdRef : 163530998
Ana Maria Loboguerrero
- Fonction : Auteur
Benjamin Sultan
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 841000
- IdHAL : benjamin-sultan
- ORCID : 0000-0003-0416-0338
Michelle Bonatti
- Fonction : Auteur
Jon Hellin
- Fonction : Auteur
Alexis Drogoul
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 835360
- ORCID : 0000-0002-9685-9199
- IdRef : 050528041
Vincent Vadez
- Fonction : Auteur
Résumé
To contribute to building sustainable and effective climate change adaptation solutions avoiding usability gap, it is largely recommended to engage in the process of co-production, integrating expertise and knowledge from various academic and non-academic actors.OBJECTIVE: We want to learn if and how co-production, believed to effectively link knowledge and decision -making, and thus suggested as the best practice in building decision-support frameworks, is really applied in the frameworks that are being implemented on the ground.METHODS: A literature review allowed us to identify integrated decision-support frameworks for climate-change adaptation in agriculture developed and used over the period of the last 10 years and involving non-academic stakeholders. To analyse them, we chose as an assessment tool the four co-production principles proposed by Norstro center dot m and colleagues: context-based, pluralistic, goal-oriented and interactive.RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The useful entry points for incorporating co-production in the design of decision -support that we found in the reviewed frameworks include among the others adequate participants selection strategy, building on existing interaction spaces, developing a theory of change with the participants, and involving participants in the design of different elements of the method. The architectures of the analyzed frameworks contained more elements that responded to pluralistic and interactive principles than to context -based and goal oriented principles, we have also identified gaps in the design, such as taking into account the personal characteristics of researchers that could strengthen a framework's implementation and its impact, or attempts at bridging different levels of decision making, to cover the triad of science, policy and practice. A detailed look at the decision-frameworks that are actually being applied allows for a critical reflection whether and how we as researchers use what we preach as an effective way of responding to sustainability challenges in agriculture. Co-production principles turn out to be a useful tool for analysis and we suggest they can be used as a check-list when designing decision-support frameworks for climate-change adaptation.SIGNIFICANCE: This papers offers useful examples of how to shift the research-led processes of decision-support towards more co-production with non-academic actors, to increase chances of bridging the gaps between science, policy and practice.
Domaines
Sciences de l'environnementFormat du dépôt | Fichier |
---|---|
Type de dépôt | Article dans une revue |
Titre |
en
Co-production opportunities seized and missed in decision-support frameworks for climate-change adaptation in agriculture – How do we practice the “best practice”?
|
Résumé |
en
To contribute to building sustainable and effective climate change adaptation solutions avoiding usability gap, it is largely recommended to engage in the process of co-production, integrating expertise and knowledge from various academic and non-academic actors.OBJECTIVE: We want to learn if and how co-production, believed to effectively link knowledge and decision -making, and thus suggested as the best practice in building decision-support frameworks, is really applied in the frameworks that are being implemented on the ground.METHODS: A literature review allowed us to identify integrated decision-support frameworks for climate-change adaptation in agriculture developed and used over the period of the last 10 years and involving non-academic stakeholders. To analyse them, we chose as an assessment tool the four co-production principles proposed by Norstro center dot m and colleagues: context-based, pluralistic, goal-oriented and interactive.RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The useful entry points for incorporating co-production in the design of decision -support that we found in the reviewed frameworks include among the others adequate participants selection strategy, building on existing interaction spaces, developing a theory of change with the participants, and involving participants in the design of different elements of the method. The architectures of the analyzed frameworks contained more elements that responded to pluralistic and interactive principles than to context -based and goal oriented principles, we have also identified gaps in the design, such as taking into account the personal characteristics of researchers that could strengthen a framework's implementation and its impact, or attempts at bridging different levels of decision making, to cover the triad of science, policy and practice. A detailed look at the decision-frameworks that are actually being applied allows for a critical reflection whether and how we as researchers use what we preach as an effective way of responding to sustainability challenges in agriculture. Co-production principles turn out to be a useful tool for analysis and we suggest they can be used as a check-list when designing decision-support frameworks for climate-change adaptation.SIGNIFICANCE: This papers offers useful examples of how to shift the research-led processes of decision-support towards more co-production with non-academic actors, to increase chances of bridging the gaps between science, policy and practice.
|
Auteur(s) |
Aleksandra Dolinska
1
, Emeline Hassenforder
2, 3, 4, 5
, Ana Maria Loboguerrero
, Benjamin Sultan
6
, Jérôme Bossuet
7
, Jeanne Cottenceau
8
, Michelle Bonatti
, Jon Hellin
, Insaf Mekki
9
, Alexis Drogoul
10, 11, 8
, Vincent Vadez
12, 13, 14, 15, 16
1
Lisode
( 89040 )
- 361 rue J-F Breton, BP 5095 4196 Montpellier Cedex 05
- France
2
UMR G-EAU -
Gestion de l'Eau, Acteurs, Usages
( 1096421 )
- 361 rue J.F. Breton - BP 5095 34196 Montpellier Cedex 5
- France
3
Cirad-ES -
Département Environnements et Sociétés
( 420902 )
- Campus international de Baillarguet TA C-DIR / B 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5 France
- France
4
UM -
Université de Montpellier
( 1100589 )
- 163 rue Auguste Broussonnet - 34090 Montpellier
- France
5
INAT -
Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie
( 303041 )
- Tunisie
6
UMR 228 Espace-Dev, Espace pour le développement
( 1100724 )
- IRD - Maison de la Télédétection - 500 rue Jean-François Breton - 34093 Montpellier
- France
7
Independent Consultant
( 336222 )
8
IRD -
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
( 67872 )
- Siège
Le Sextant
44, bd de Dunkerque
CS 90009
13572 Marseille cedex 02
- France
9
INRGREF -
Institut National de Recherche en Génie Rural Eaux et Forêts
( 93215 )
- Rue Hédi Karray B.P N°10 2080 Ariana TUNISIE
- Tunisie
10
UMMISCO -
Unité de modélisation mathématique et informatique des systèmes complexes [Bondy]
( 541946 )
- IRD France Nord - 32 avenue Henri Varagnat - 93143 Bondy cedex
- France
11
Thuyloi University
( 534087 )
- Viêt Nam
12
UMR DIADE -
Diversité, adaptation, développement des plantes
( 1100723 )
- Centre IRD de Montpellier 911 av Agropolis BP 604501 34394 Montpellier cedex 5
- France
13
LAPSE -
LMI Adaptation des Plantes et microorganismes associés aux Stress Environnementaux [Dakar]
( 412542 )
- Centre de Recherche de Bel-Air
BP 1386
CP 18524 Dakar
- Sénégal
14
CERAAS -
Centre d'Etude Regional Pour l'Amelioration de l'Adaptation A la Secheresse
( 411904 )
- , BP 3320, Thiès Escale, Thiès, Senegal
- Sénégal
15
ISRA -
Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles [Dakar]
( 427299 )
- Rte des hydrocarbures, Dakar
- Sénégal
16
ICRISAT -
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics [Inde]
( 212719 )
- Patancheru 502 324
Telangana State
- Inde
|
Vulgarisation |
Non
|
Comité de lecture |
Oui
|
Audience |
Internationale
|
Licence |
Paternité
|
Langue du document |
Anglais
|
Nom de la revue |
|
Public visé |
Scientifique
|
Date de publication |
2023-12
|
Volume |
212
|
Page/Identifiant |
103775
|
Domaine(s) |
|
Mots-clés |
en
Co-production, Climate-change adaptation, Decision-support framework, Usability-gap, Non-academic actors
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103775 |
Base Horizon | fdi:010088572 |
UT key WOS | 001087089800001 |
Loading...